Newfoundland Hockey Talk

I agree Bull Moose i would sit Churchill for the first game to see what O'Brien can do.If he has a bad game give Churchill the next game.But i can't see that happening with churchill.I don't think Churchill will let O'Brien play while he is available.Happgood should think about this seeing that Churchill is not going to make every game this year,so some one on there said.The way the teams are playing now all the goalies are on par.One time Churchill was on top but now the rest of the goalies have proven that they are just as good or better than Churchill

royal cat wrote:I agree Bull Moose i would sit Churchill for the first game to see what O'Brien can do.If he has a bad game give Churchill the next game.But i can't see that happening with churchill.I don't think Churchill will let O'Brien play while he is available.Hapgood should think about this seeing that Churchill is not going to make every game this year,so some one on there said.The way the teams are playing now all the goalies are on par.One time Churchill was on top but now the rest of the goalies have proven that they are just as good or better than Churchill

I can guarantee you that if Church flies in from Nova Scotia,he plays.

Why would any team fly in a goaltender from Nova Scotia and sit him on the bench????????

royalcat wrote:I agree Bull Moose i would sit Churchill for the first game to see what O'Brien can do.If he has a bad game give Churchill the next game.But i can't see that happening with churchill.I don't think Churchill will let O'Brien play while he is available.Happgood should think about this seeing that Churchill is not going to make every game this year,so some one on there said.The way the teams are playing now all the goalies are on par.One time Churchill was on top but now the rest of the goalies have proven that they are just as good or better than Churchill

Churchill will play when he is available.......As good as O'Brien is, he is not Jason Churchill!

royalcat wrote:I agree Bull Moose i would sit Churchill for the first game to see what O'Brien can do.If he has a bad game give Churchill the next game.But i can't see that happening with churchill.I don't think Churchill will let O'Brien play while he is available.Happgood should think about this seeing that Churchill is not going to make every game this year,so some one on there said.The way the teams are playing now all the goalies are on par.One time Churchill was on top but now the rest of the goalies have proven that they are just as good or better than Churchill

Church should only miss one more weekend sometime after the New year and that should be it, There are some real good goalies in this league, Church is still a awesome goalie and he has proven that so far this year, I am glad that Church will be in net the weekend against the Blades, I know O'brien is good and he helped us beat the blades last sat night, Against the Ceebees my friend told me he let in 3 soft goals that Church would have had, I agree what Geno said "O'brien is good but he is no Church by far

CaribousFan wrote:

royalcat wrote:I agree Bull Moose i would sit Churchill for the first game to see what O'Brien can do.If he has a bad game give Churchill the next game.But i can't see that happening with churchill.I don't think Churchill will let O'Brien play while he is available.Happgood should think about this seeing that Churchill is not going to make every game this year,so some one on there said.The way the teams are playing now all the goalies are on par.One time Churchill was on top but now the rest of the goalies have proven that they are just as good or better than Churchill

Church should only miss one more weekend sometime after the New year and that should be it, There are some real good goalies in this league, Church is still a awesome goalie and he has proven that so far this year, I am glad that Church will be in net the weekend against the Blades, I know O'brien is good and he helped us beat the blades last sat night, Against the Ceebees my friend told me he let in 3 soft goals that Church would have had, I agree what Geno said "O'brien is good but he is no Church by far

3 soft goals that church would of had.. give me a break.. you have churchhill so high on his thorn he cant do no wrong.. I seen church play and he is like every other goalie.. He lets in his fair share of soft goals.. Then again if church did fly in and didnt play he probably would throw a tantrum,...

only going by what I was told, If it wasn't for Church, We would not have won those 2 herders or even the allan cup for that matter, I know Church have let in his fair of soft goals but he by far one of the best goalies in NL, I guess you are not a real big fan of Church than, We would not have done well if it wasn't for Church and I am sure you can't deny that one

CaribousFan wrote:only going by what I was told, If it wasn't for Church, We would not have won those 2 herders or even the allan cup for that matter, I know Church have let in his fair of soft goals but he by far one of the best goalies in NL, I guess you are not a real big fan of Church than, We would not have done well if it wasn't for Church and I am sure you can't deny that one

You would not have won the allan cup if it wasnt for the CEEBEE players.. If he was so great, he would have carried the team to allan cup the first time.. Not loosing every game like he did...

Bull Moose wrote:

CaribousFan wrote:only going by what I was told, If it wasn't for Church, We would not have won those 2 herders or even the allan cup for that matter, I know Church have let in his fair of soft goals but he by far one of the best goalies in NL, I guess you are not a real big fan of Church than, We would not have done well if it wasn't for Church and I am sure you can't deny that one

You would not have won the allan cup if it wasnt for the CEEBEE players.. If he was so great, he would have carried the team to allan cup the first time.. Not loosing every game like he did...

The Caribous did not really know what they were going up again, I am sure if the Cats go with just their team, They might suffer the same faith, Yes the Caribous did affiliate with the Ceebees and I thank for the ones who went, We would not have done without them, The Caribous were allowed to affiliate so why not affiliate with another team when given the option to, The Caribous are representing NL not just Clarenville, I know you are a Caribous fan, From your post you don't seem like a real big fan

So your finally accepting what people on this site have been saying for 2-3 years, CVille are as good as Church, finally.